File image of President William Ruto
Katiba Institute and the Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) have filed a petition at the High Court of Kenya to challenge Dr. Duncan Oburu Ojwang’s nomination as Chairperson of the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR).
In a statement on Wednesday, KHRC said the petition follows the announcement made on 5 August 2025 by the National Assembly that it had received the President’s nomination of Dr. Ojwang and would proceed to vetting.
The two bodies argued that the Constitution prohibits the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of any independent commission from being of the same gender.
“At the heart of the Petition is Article 250(11) of the Constitution of Kenya, which expressly prohibits the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of any independent commission from being of the same gender. The current Vice-Chairperson, Dr. Raymond Nyeris, is male.
“Despite this, the selection panel invited, shortlisted, and recommended another male, Dr. Ojwang, for the position, and the President subsequently nominated him,” read the statement in part.
The petitioners argue that the nomination violates the Constitution and the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights Act, reiterating the gender diversity requirement.
They accused the Selection Panel, the President, and the National Assembly of failing to uphold national values, particularly gender equity, the rule of law, integrity, and inclusivity.
“Filed under Articles 3(1), 10, 27, 73, 232, and 250(11) of the Constitution, the Petition alleges that the process discriminated against qualified women candidates, unjustifiably limited women’s rights to equality, and disrespected the principles of public service and leadership integrity,” KHRC stated.
The petition also invokes international instruments such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Maputo Protocol, which Kenya is bound to uphold.
The petition seeks various declarations and orders, including the nullification of Dr. Ojwang’s nomination and a directive compelling strict compliance with the constitutional gender requirements for appointments to independent commissions. It also asks the court to declare that any actions taken based on the unconstitutional nomination are invalid.
